Dubious cancels and overprints again

I have already written about stamps and covers being offered from Armenia that wear forged cancels. Right now on Delcampe are more of these. While the pictures are not really good and therefore its not easy to be absolutely sure, I have serious doubts regarding the overprints and the cancels. I consider those items to be dangerous forgeries.

I don’t like the manuscript overprint and the cancel. Also, it seems there is already a weak impression of another cancel on the stamp. Looks like someone tested his pimp up skills.

The overprint looks really bad and the cancel too.

While the basic shape of the overprint is ok, ink and border is definitely not. Cancel looks fishy too.

Posted in Ebay, Delcampe and Co, First Erivan, Forged | 1 Comment

More about Gustave Boël

When searching for information about Gustave Boël I found this article on wikipedia.com. At first this seemed to be a perfect match: From Belgium, metal and coal industry. But it is not possible. Since he died in 1912 it must have been another Gustave Boël who send the Katarstky covers in 1920. Perhaps someone from the same family.

Here are some recent pictures from the abandoned blast furnaces of the ‘Usines Gustave Boël‘ in La Louvière in Belgium.

Perhaps some of the readers can shed some light on this puzzling matter.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Gustave Boël – engineer and philatelist

When I saw this card on eBay I remembered hearing the name Boël in connection with the Zangezur provisionals and, on impulse, bought it.

After receiving the card I started examining the card in more detail. A Mister Gustave Boël writes on the 16 of August 1908 from Allaverdi to a Mister E. Landgraf in Jessnitz in the county of Anhalt (Germany) where the card arrived on the 24 of August. Allaverdi is a town situated in the north of Armenia not far from the border to Georgia. The town is one of the two major copper mining sites in Armenia – the other one being Kapan (Ghapan, Zangezur or Madan) deep in the south of Armenia. In the 18th century the mines in Allaverdi produced almost a quarter of the copper used in the Russian empire. At the end of the 19th century the concession to exploit the mine was sold to the French. That much can be learned by browsing the Wikipedia articles. More about the background can be found in the book “Pioneers for Profit: Foreign Entrepreneurship and Russian industrialization 1885-1913” by John P. McKay; The University of Chicago Press 1970.

From 1880 to 1917 Russia experienced a rapid industrial development. Foreign investment increased form 17 percent to 47 percent. In 1897 the Bonnardel Group (as the Caucasian Industrial and Metallurgical Company) entered the copper industry in the Allaverdi region by subleasing undeveloped properties from a French company. Besting all obstacles including strikes, assassinations, insufficient transport infrastructure and technical difficulties they successfully implemented their business. Production of refined copper rose from almost nothing in 1897 to 750 tons in 1900 and 4,100 tons in 1912. In 1907 they started examining mineral deposits near the Persian border looking to expand their business even further. After a positive feedback from the engineer and legal studies a property at Zangezur was purchased. This region is a well know source of copper since ancient times. Kapan (Also Ghapan or Zangezur), was the site of one of the most famous Caucasian copper mines, known since the earliest times of the prehistoric Bronze Age, and which had supplied to Assyria, Babylonia and other gone-by empires the then valuable metal from which they had forged the weapons of their incessant wars. Smelting works were built in Kapan and the Factories of the Kartar valley (Katarskie-Zavody) developed. The mining business was so important that both locations (Allaverdi and Katarskie-Zavody) had their own post office. The company (Caucasian Industrial and Metallurgical Company) employed several foreign engineers and technicians. One of them was a Belgian engineer with the name Gustave Boël. It is not a way of guess that the card I purchased was written by exactly that engineer which worked then for this company. And it gets even more interesting. In the card Mr. Boël writes that he separately sent some Georgian stamps to Mr. Landgraf. Also, that he did not receive the Senf catalog yet. This clearly exposes Mr. Boël as a philatelist. This is the connection to the Zangezur provisionals. The known covers were sent in 1920 by Gustave Boël who was visiting the Katarskie-Zavody from January till June.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Working with the ARTAR Catalog – Odds and Errors : Part 9

For all pictorial issues exist several kind forgeries (including so called reprints). The good thing is, when you know where to look, its not too hard to detect them. This is especially useful when dealing with the forged overprints – where some numerals have few characteristics and dangerous forgeries exist. Here are two examples where the author of the catalog would not have fallen for the forgeries if he just had checked the basic stamp more carefully.

Page 141

The basic stamp is a forgery. That means the overprint cant be good. The ink is wrong too (this is not easy to check with the red inks). The “1” Overprint is not easy to check – few characteristics and many dangerous forgeries. The arrows point to the place where you can easily see the stamp is forged.

 

Page 175


The basic stamps is a forgery. Manual correction and overprint too. While the “20” overprint is quite common, the correction is not and also dangerous (while quite near to the original) forgeries  of the basic overprint do exist. The arrow points to the place where you can easily see the stamp is forged.

Posted in Forged, Second Essayan, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forged Covers

There are couple of sellers that operate from Armenia. Some of them had a lot of genuine material, some had mixed genuine and forged. Lately I encounter more frequently a certain kind of forged cancellations within their stocks (see a few posts below for an example). Here are two covers with bear the same kind of fake-cancels. Probably all made by the same person and, since they first appear within the stock of Armenian sellers, produced in Armenia. The theme is always to use genuine more or less common or ugly material and pimp it up with fake cancels. The cancels are crudely drawn, the circles not equally round, digits and characters unclean and distorted. Beware!

Forged Alexandropol cancel.

The basic letter is probably genuine. But the two cancels are certainly not. 

 

Forged Alexandropol railway station cancel.


Second Forged  cancel.

Posted in Ebay, Delcampe and Co, Forged, k60k, Second Essayan | 1 Comment

Digital Forgery?

I bought some lots on Delcampe that I thought looked promising. One item is this block of four.

Here is the image the seller put on Delcampe.

What do you think? I was in a hurry and made a bet, looking forward to study the cancel. After receiving and washing the item I made this scan.

I did not like what I saw anymore. The dark black cancel fragment at the bottom looks fake and the ink of the overprints is looking odd. The gray cancel is not readable.

I high resolution scan (2400 dpi) provided more insight.

This definitely looks wrong. I think this is a digital copy of an overprint. Compare the four overprints. They look absolutely identical. I guess I need to check more carefully before I bet.

Posted in Ebay, Delcampe and Co, Forged, Ruble | 3 Comments

Overprints on Romanov and charity stamps

Some enthusiasts brought stamps of the Romanov and the charity set to Armenia and had them overprinted. Later forgers discovered that they like these stamps too. They are bigger and just look like more. Nowadays collectors often think likewise. Still, most of the overprinted stamps on the market bear faked overprints.

Here two lots that carry faked overprints.

Posted in Ebay, Delcampe and Co, Forged, Ruble | 1 Comment

Fake Cancel?

Not long ago I bought this nice letter piece from a seller located in Armenia. The cancel is rare and so I thought the money on this is well spent.

The stamp has the secret marks of the genuine print and the overprint too is looking good. What made me stop was the cancel. It looks kind of unclear and uneven. While the times were difficult and due to the many hand made overprints and emergency issues one is prone to accept unclear and distorted prints. At rare and smaller local stations perhaps even more. At least to a certain amount. A nagging feeling of doubt started and did not vanish.

When I stumbled upon this piece with two instances of the same cancel, I instantly thought: now I have something to compare. About time for research. Besides, this document certainly looks genuine. It is also way to too ugly and cheap to fake to.

The cancels in detail.

I also checked Zakiyan. There are nine Etchmiadzin cancels (without Armenian script). Out of those it could only be type 13 (due to position of left asterisk -star – character).

The problem here is, that Zakiyan draw those cancels by hand. This way its not possible to use this images for complete comparison purposes. But luckily I got another document for this.

By now you have probably seen it already by yourself. The cancel on the stamp is a forgery.

Some points in detail:

– the outer borderline on the genuine cancel is thicker than the inner circle – this is not true for the fake one

– the upper horizontal line is blotted (double)

– the digits of the date are warped and not as exact as on the genuine cancel

– the characters of the name of the post station are wrong

 

In the last months I have seen a lot of these doubtful cancels – primarily on cut pieces – on ebay and Co. Most of the time from sellers in Armenia.

Here an example that is currently listed.

It is clearly fake too. Be very careful with those items.

Postscript: Another fake cancel fresh from the internet.

Posted in Ebay, Delcampe and Co, First Essayan, Forged | Leave a comment

Working with the ARTAR Catalog – Odds and Errors : Part 8

The forgeries of the stamps of the Erivan pictorial issue are normally not too hard to detect, but sometimes, one slips through. Happened on page 184.

The giveaway is the broken socket of the stone in the lower right corner. Of course the overprint cant be genuine, if the basic stamps is a forgery.

Posted in First Erivan, Forged | 1 Comment

Working with the ARTAR Catalog – Odds and Errors : Part 7

There is a saying in business. If it looks too good to be true, it probably is! I am talking about the perforated stamps of this set. The unused stamps of this issue are – with the exception of those, that were not overprinted – already really rare. Its more than likely that only one sheet of each denomination existed in the archives of Erivan and was later sold through Moscow. Not one of experts from Tchilinghirian to Zakiyan and Ceresa reported the existence of perforated stamps of this set. There is no document in the archives describing that those stamps were perforated. So of course it is not impossible someone made a handful of perforated stamps back then. But, how probable is it? Also, how can one attest the evidence of those? And last but most important: how hard is it to produce this super rare rarity? Probably much easier than faking a cover with cancel, overprint etc.

So sorry, but I am not buying this.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment